Because there are other alternatives that would replace or relieve animal testing, the use of animals would decrease dramatically. This involves detailed examination of the procedures and the number and type of animals used. Animal testing doesnt always prove the safety of products for humans, but it may also prevent researchers from making The use of the Draize test and the LD50 test to examine product toxicity has decreased over the past few years, but these tests have not been eliminated completely. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available. an end to testing new drugs or. Thus, animals should be treated with the same respect as humans. Although a moral community could theoretically include animals, it frequently does not. .This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment" (qtd. Everything you need to know! The HOPES team aims to make our Huntington's Disease (HD) information and resources accessible to people of all HD backgrounds and experiences. Therefore, they should have the same moral status and deserve equal treatment. Debates at Fluent English Language School 18,March, Sat, 12.00
Come & speak out! Therefore, it is ethically wrong to use harmful and invasive research on such animals. Non-animal testing methods are humane for the sake of both humans and animals. Not only are time, money and animals lives being wasted (with a huge amount of suffering), but effective treatments are being mistakenly discarded and harmful treatments are getting through. Animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, not for their own good, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment. What is food addiction describe it in one paragraph. a marketing ban prohibition to market finished cosmetic products and ingredients in the The problem is described in the first article each group, and the articles underneath describe the drug itself and any research that has been performed. Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Do you think it should be banned? Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, source@https://animalethics101.blogspot.com/p/nathan-nobis.html, status page at https://status.libretexts.org. It had been tested on animals first. using human beings for all safety tests. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinsons disease or schizophrenia. The following sections briefly outline a few of the arguments for and against animal experimentation. conducted an analysisof 27 key animal-based breakthroughs. The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! In another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done inside a test tube. Animals are also regularly tested by the military. Yet animals' rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice. Also, examine which other entities benefit from using animals in experiments (e.g., breeders, governmental organizations, and scientists who study only captive animals). Accordingly, animal experimentation should not be banned. Want free educational posters and stickers for students to use during their debates? Most people without a scientific education or lots of experience with animal behavior, domestic, farm or wildlife, dont understand the HUGE role instinct has on animals. The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation, Gallup Poll Shows Majority of Americans Are Concerned About Animal Rights, Genomic Responses in Mouse Models Poorly Mimic Human Inflammatory Diseases, More Americans Than Ever Oppose Medical Testing on Animals, Poll Finds That Supermajority of Americans Oppose Tests on Animals, Problems Associated With Animal Experimentation, 8 Expert Quotes Admitting That Testing on Animals Is Unreliable, Dallas Doc Backs Protest of Texas A&M Dog Experiments, Jane Goodall: Animal Experiments Are Morally Wrong and Unacceptable, Expert Statements: Texas A&M Muscular Dystrophy Experiments on Dogs, Forum: Scientists Need the Courage to Take a Look at Inhumane Experiments on Animals, MD Patient Urges Charity to Stop Funding Useless Procedures and Failed Experiments, Statements of Scientific Consultants Regarding NIH Maternal Deprivation Experiments on Monkeys, Yale Professor Says Experiments on Animals Are Wasteful, Behind the Locked Doors of U.S. and French Dog Laboratories, Dissection Must End: Pigeons Drowned, Live Crayfish Injected With Latex at Bio Corporation, Dogs and Cats Suffer, Die at Liberty Research. Though individuals with the HD gene will develop symptoms, lifestyle choices such as dietary restrictions, physical therapy, and exercise may help manage symptoms when they develop. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! The key phrase here is as far as is possible and practicable. Animals are subjected to tests that are often painful or cause permanent damage or death, and they are never given the option of not participating in the experiment. 5000 Research Forest Drive This test is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. There is great variability in age of onset and progression of disease, only about 40% of which can be explained by the number of CAG repeats and lifestyle choices might account for some of that variability. Animal testing should not be banned completely. In the absence of better alternatives, it helps us acquire knowledge about the effects of drugs. But, yes, the testing should be carried out carefully so that it does not result in the death of the animals. Rangan Banik, Class XI, Aditya Academy Secondary, Calcutta Some people advocate a European origin for the mutation, suggesting that migration and inter-racial mixture of genes led to a lower prevalence in non-European countries. Next, the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Though people with the HD allele will eventually show symptoms, there are many lifestyle choices that can make the disease easier to manage. The precision it purports to provide is an illusion because of uncontrollable biological variables" (31). This page titled 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nathan Nobis (Open Philosophy Press) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request. subtitle: Animal testing is carried out in a wide range of areas, including biological research, and testing medicines and chemicals. Almost every classroom debate unit or school debate teams topics include the question of whether or not its justifiable for humans to test on animals. My point is still valid even if I abandon my consciousness argument. 5. Not only are these non-animal tests more humane, theyre also more relevant to humans and have the potential to be cheaper and faster. To help put a stop to it, only buy products not tested on animals. Many of the food and eating practices discussed in this section are still being researched, and so just as with HD treatments, please always consult a physician to see if a particular food or eating practice is right for you. Even if something is necessary and there are no alternatives to doing it to achieve a particular end, that doesnt make doing the action right: the end determines that. New York: Oxford UP, 1993. WebWhat are some reminders during debate. Text UGLY to 73822 to tell UGGs to choose vegan materials and stop supporting the mutilation and violent killing of sheep! Research shows that these choices could explain the variability in age of onset and progression of disease observed in HD patients. Because animals as distant from humans as mice and rats share many physiological and genetic similarities with humans, animal experimentation can be tremendously helpful for furthering medical science. The prevalence is 0.4 per 100,000 people in Hong Kong and 0.65 per 100,000 in Japan. Why? Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease. Sources: Animal Research: How it Benefits Both Humans and Animals. Most people within the vegan community argue that animal testing should be banned. Are sour patch kids vegan? So while no one can choose their own genes, people at risk for HD can choose a healthy lifestyle. Its wasteful. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in the United States. Here are the top five reasons why it needs to stop: Its unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animalsto life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. First, and most obviously, drugs and medical procedures treat diseases, injuries, and other health problems. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, the development of products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" is advocated instead of testing on animals (3). The exploitation of animals in experimentation isnt a new issue because it could be traced back to the fourth century BC when Aristotle and his contemporaries used to perform experiments on animals. We hope these tools, mediums,and different resources encourage HD education and awareness throughout HD communities and beyond. Many would and thats an understandable feeling. There is no accurate data obtained from Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines. Animals and people are alike in many ways; they both feel, think, behave, and experience pain. The testing process must include one type of rodent and one non-rodent. Ones diet can have an immense influence on everything from energy level to the ability to fight diseases. The HD Scientists section gives some insight into the work that some individuals are doing, and the Research Institutions section talks about some major sites of HD research. Our site is intended to be an educational resource, and address a range of topics through written articles and podcasts. Experimental animals are virtually tortured to death, and all of these tests are done in the interest of human welfare, without any thought to how the animals are treated. Fortunately, its been illegal to test cosmetic products, such as make-up, perfumes and moisturisers, on animals in the UK and all EU countries since 1998. Why? Both infants and the mentally handicapped frequently lack complex cognitive capacities, full autonomy, or even both of these traits. Below, we look at these more closely. While a combination of chemical and human cell tests has been shown to accurately predict human skin reactions 90% of the time, skin irritation tests on rabbits only predict human reactions 60% of the time. 1. In Favor :- Many human lives can be saved by carrying out experiments on animals beforehand. When it comes to considering the pros and cons of animal testing, the research suggests that live experimentation could be replaced with ethical and potentially more efficient methods. Its challenging to consider the potential benefits of testing on animals if you dont believe that human and non-human lives should be valued any differently. Create a list of typical statements made by parties who want vivisection to continue. A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation. And more importantly, if my child were dying and I tried to experiment on my neighbors children to try to save my own child, that would be wrong. These procedures range from research into the immune system to the breeding of genetically altered species. To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die. Also, scientists have recognized that genes only tell part of the story, as described here. Aspirin is toxic to many animals and would not be on our pharmacy shelves if it had been tested according to current animal testing standards. Animals may be subject to experimentation or modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human disease or for testing potential human treatments. We know that many schools assign debates on topical issues to help their students learn to speak and write persuasively, develop research skills, and recognize multiple sides of a controversial or multifaceted issueand experimenting on animals is certainly one such topic. WebResolved: Animal testing is ineffective, unethical, and wasteful and should be replaced with non-animal methods. Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. People of all genders should be required to register for the draft. Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. "Zoos are prisons for animals, camouflaging their cruelty with conservation claims," Mimi Bekhechi, director of international programmes at PETA, explains. The rules surrounding animal testing vary from country to country. Chocolate, grapes, raisins, avocados and macadamia nuts are harmless in humans but toxic to dogs. The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. This section is divided into 5 groups. Many animals, especially the higher mammalian species, possess internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs. All over the world, communities impacted by HD are coming together to work towards new solutions and ways to cope. Usually, this middle view accepts experimentation on some, but not all, animals and aims to avoid unnecessary use of animals in scientific research by pursuing alternatives to animal testing. . Each of us can help prevent animal suffering and take a stand against vivisection by buying cruelty-free products, requesting alternatives to animal dissection at school, donating only to charities that dont experiment on animals, and demanding the immediate implementation of humane, effective non-animal tests by government agencies and corporations. Animals do not get many of the diseases we do, such as Parkinsons disease, major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimers disease, HIV or schizophrenia. By sharing these traits, they belong to a particular moral community and thus take on certain responsibilities toward each other and assume specific rights. Both because of the hereditary nature and long-term severity of the disease, the effects of Huntingtons disease cast a wide net. The Draize test has been criticized for being unreliable and a needless waste of animal life. The prevalence of HD in the West is estimated at five to ten people per 100,000 people. The UK government has admitted to testing on animals to develop protective pharmaceuticals, such as Nerve Agent Pretreatment Sets (NAPS), but this is just one example of how animals are used in the armed forces. Here you will find reviews on published resources related to Huntingtons disease. A hot topic in classrooms and on the minds of the public is the use of animals in experiments. Its now easy to see why animal testing is wrong: it violates basic principles of ethical research: it is maleficent, or harmful to the research subjects; it is not beneficial to them; it is forced on them since they dont consent; and it is unjust in that animals are burdened with problems not their own. Animals have been subject to inhumane testing processes for almost as long as humans have been manufacturing products. Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on animals. Many cosmetic companies, for example, have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects. First, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research. Web 145 debate topics and ideas simple debate topics death penalty and its abolishment. Of course, these laws are still far from ideal but they are much kinder than those of many other countries. It is not surprising to find that treatments showing promise in animals rarely work in humans. In respect to his capacity, many animals are no different than humans. WebBanning the use of such drugs, however, would greatly reduce the efficiency of the industry, driving up the cost of meat. Have students use the curated content in this debate resource kit to prepare an affirmative argument stating why animals shouldnt be used for experimentation. What do you think about animal testing? It helps This list is grouped by mechanism; each of the groups represents a different problem that HD causes in the brain, and the drugs that might fight that problem. The Moral Community., Frey, R.G. We hope this medium allows information to be more accessible and educational for audiences, and creates a space to discuss topics important to the HD community. A drug trial in France resulted in the death of one volunteer and left four others severely brain damaged in 2016. Its wrong and should be banned. Whats worse, scientific research isnt the only reason for animal testing. a testing ban prohibition to test finished cosmetic products and cosmetic ingredients on animals. Investigate what benefits laboratories, universities, and experimenters gain by using animals in experiments, and think critically about their motivations. However, in Asia, the prevalence of HD is approximately one tenth of the HD prevalence in Western population. Animal testing may be unsafe for humans. For those who want a ban on animal testing to be lifted, the procedure is not ethical but only serves to infringe on the rights of animals. The arguments made by critics however are shortsighted because history clearly indicates that the drugs that people are using nowadays came as a result of animal testing. The lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situation cause some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior, such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves. Human volunteers testing a new monoclonal antibody treatment (TGN1412) at Northwick Park Hospital, UK, in 2006 suffered a severe immune reaction and nearly died. UW-Madison Stops Cruel Experiments; Cats Saved, Alzheimers Researchers Admit That Experiments on Animals Are a Big Fat Failure. More recently, we. What is food addiction describe it in one paragraph. Its the whole nature vs. nurture. The cosmetics directive provides the regulatory framework for the phasing out of animal testing for cosmetics purposes. But the value we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived value to humans" (34). An analysis of over 100 mouse cell types found that only 50% of the DNA responsible for regulating genes in mice could be matched with human DNA. Another alternative to this test is a product called Eyetex. It is immoral for live humans to be used for possibly dangerous science experiments. 1047 Words5 Pages. The claim is that animals should be afforded the same level of respectful treatment as humans; in short, we should not have the right to kill animals, force them into our service, or otherwise treat them merely as means to further our own goals. Providing high quality, disease-free environments for the animals will help ensure that every animal counts. Use the following links to conduct research on general information about vivisection and prepare logical arguments: Use the following links to gather evidence and examples to support your position against experiments on animals: Research Articles, Scholarly Articles, and Investigative Analysis, Accounts and Statement From Vivisectors, Experts, and Patients, Eyewitness Investigations, Whistleblower Reports, and Videos, Evidence of the Wastefulness and Ineffectiveness of Vivisection. These individuals feel that animals have no rights because they lack the capacity to understand or to knowingly exercise these rights. (n.d.). For many people, the big question is: why do industries rely on animal experimentation? Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effectivenon-animal research methodsincluding organs-on-chips, organoids, human-based microdosing,in vitrotechnology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modelingthat are cheaper, faster, and more accurate than animal tests.
Come & speak out! Therefore, it is ethically wrong to use harmful and invasive research on such animals. Non-animal testing methods are humane for the sake of both humans and animals. Not only are time, money and animals lives being wasted (with a huge amount of suffering), but effective treatments are being mistakenly discarded and harmful treatments are getting through. Animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, not for their own good, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment. What is food addiction describe it in one paragraph. a marketing ban prohibition to market finished cosmetic products and ingredients in the The problem is described in the first article each group, and the articles underneath describe the drug itself and any research that has been performed. Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Do you think it should be banned? Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, source@https://animalethics101.blogspot.com/p/nathan-nobis.html, status page at https://status.libretexts.org. It had been tested on animals first. using human beings for all safety tests. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinsons disease or schizophrenia. The following sections briefly outline a few of the arguments for and against animal experimentation. conducted an analysisof 27 key animal-based breakthroughs. The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! In another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done inside a test tube. Animals are also regularly tested by the military. Yet animals' rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice. Also, examine which other entities benefit from using animals in experiments (e.g., breeders, governmental organizations, and scientists who study only captive animals). Accordingly, animal experimentation should not be banned. Want free educational posters and stickers for students to use during their debates? Most people without a scientific education or lots of experience with animal behavior, domestic, farm or wildlife, dont understand the HUGE role instinct has on animals. The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation, Gallup Poll Shows Majority of Americans Are Concerned About Animal Rights, Genomic Responses in Mouse Models Poorly Mimic Human Inflammatory Diseases, More Americans Than Ever Oppose Medical Testing on Animals, Poll Finds That Supermajority of Americans Oppose Tests on Animals, Problems Associated With Animal Experimentation, 8 Expert Quotes Admitting That Testing on Animals Is Unreliable, Dallas Doc Backs Protest of Texas A&M Dog Experiments, Jane Goodall: Animal Experiments Are Morally Wrong and Unacceptable, Expert Statements: Texas A&M Muscular Dystrophy Experiments on Dogs, Forum: Scientists Need the Courage to Take a Look at Inhumane Experiments on Animals, MD Patient Urges Charity to Stop Funding Useless Procedures and Failed Experiments, Statements of Scientific Consultants Regarding NIH Maternal Deprivation Experiments on Monkeys, Yale Professor Says Experiments on Animals Are Wasteful, Behind the Locked Doors of U.S. and French Dog Laboratories, Dissection Must End: Pigeons Drowned, Live Crayfish Injected With Latex at Bio Corporation, Dogs and Cats Suffer, Die at Liberty Research. Though individuals with the HD gene will develop symptoms, lifestyle choices such as dietary restrictions, physical therapy, and exercise may help manage symptoms when they develop. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! The key phrase here is as far as is possible and practicable. Animals are subjected to tests that are often painful or cause permanent damage or death, and they are never given the option of not participating in the experiment. 5000 Research Forest Drive This test is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. There is great variability in age of onset and progression of disease, only about 40% of which can be explained by the number of CAG repeats and lifestyle choices might account for some of that variability. Animal testing should not be banned completely. In the absence of better alternatives, it helps us acquire knowledge about the effects of drugs. But, yes, the testing should be carried out carefully so that it does not result in the death of the animals. Rangan Banik, Class XI, Aditya Academy Secondary, Calcutta Some people advocate a European origin for the mutation, suggesting that migration and inter-racial mixture of genes led to a lower prevalence in non-European countries. Next, the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Though people with the HD allele will eventually show symptoms, there are many lifestyle choices that can make the disease easier to manage. The precision it purports to provide is an illusion because of uncontrollable biological variables" (31). This page titled 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nathan Nobis (Open Philosophy Press) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request. subtitle: Animal testing is carried out in a wide range of areas, including biological research, and testing medicines and chemicals. Almost every classroom debate unit or school debate teams topics include the question of whether or not its justifiable for humans to test on animals. My point is still valid even if I abandon my consciousness argument. 5. Not only are these non-animal tests more humane, theyre also more relevant to humans and have the potential to be cheaper and faster. To help put a stop to it, only buy products not tested on animals. Many of the food and eating practices discussed in this section are still being researched, and so just as with HD treatments, please always consult a physician to see if a particular food or eating practice is right for you. Even if something is necessary and there are no alternatives to doing it to achieve a particular end, that doesnt make doing the action right: the end determines that. New York: Oxford UP, 1993. WebWhat are some reminders during debate. Text UGLY to 73822 to tell UGGs to choose vegan materials and stop supporting the mutilation and violent killing of sheep! Research shows that these choices could explain the variability in age of onset and progression of disease observed in HD patients. Because animals as distant from humans as mice and rats share many physiological and genetic similarities with humans, animal experimentation can be tremendously helpful for furthering medical science. The prevalence is 0.4 per 100,000 people in Hong Kong and 0.65 per 100,000 in Japan. Why? Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease. Sources: Animal Research: How it Benefits Both Humans and Animals. Most people within the vegan community argue that animal testing should be banned. Are sour patch kids vegan? So while no one can choose their own genes, people at risk for HD can choose a healthy lifestyle. Its wasteful. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in the United States. Here are the top five reasons why it needs to stop: Its unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animalsto life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. First, and most obviously, drugs and medical procedures treat diseases, injuries, and other health problems. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, the development of products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" is advocated instead of testing on animals (3). The exploitation of animals in experimentation isnt a new issue because it could be traced back to the fourth century BC when Aristotle and his contemporaries used to perform experiments on animals. We hope these tools, mediums,and different resources encourage HD education and awareness throughout HD communities and beyond. Many would and thats an understandable feeling. There is no accurate data obtained from Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines. Animals and people are alike in many ways; they both feel, think, behave, and experience pain. The testing process must include one type of rodent and one non-rodent. Ones diet can have an immense influence on everything from energy level to the ability to fight diseases. The HD Scientists section gives some insight into the work that some individuals are doing, and the Research Institutions section talks about some major sites of HD research. Our site is intended to be an educational resource, and address a range of topics through written articles and podcasts. Experimental animals are virtually tortured to death, and all of these tests are done in the interest of human welfare, without any thought to how the animals are treated. Fortunately, its been illegal to test cosmetic products, such as make-up, perfumes and moisturisers, on animals in the UK and all EU countries since 1998. Why? Both infants and the mentally handicapped frequently lack complex cognitive capacities, full autonomy, or even both of these traits. Below, we look at these more closely. While a combination of chemical and human cell tests has been shown to accurately predict human skin reactions 90% of the time, skin irritation tests on rabbits only predict human reactions 60% of the time. 1. In Favor :- Many human lives can be saved by carrying out experiments on animals beforehand. When it comes to considering the pros and cons of animal testing, the research suggests that live experimentation could be replaced with ethical and potentially more efficient methods. Its challenging to consider the potential benefits of testing on animals if you dont believe that human and non-human lives should be valued any differently. Create a list of typical statements made by parties who want vivisection to continue. A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation. And more importantly, if my child were dying and I tried to experiment on my neighbors children to try to save my own child, that would be wrong. These procedures range from research into the immune system to the breeding of genetically altered species. To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die. Also, scientists have recognized that genes only tell part of the story, as described here. Aspirin is toxic to many animals and would not be on our pharmacy shelves if it had been tested according to current animal testing standards. Animals may be subject to experimentation or modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human disease or for testing potential human treatments. We know that many schools assign debates on topical issues to help their students learn to speak and write persuasively, develop research skills, and recognize multiple sides of a controversial or multifaceted issueand experimenting on animals is certainly one such topic. WebResolved: Animal testing is ineffective, unethical, and wasteful and should be replaced with non-animal methods. Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. People of all genders should be required to register for the draft. Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. "Zoos are prisons for animals, camouflaging their cruelty with conservation claims," Mimi Bekhechi, director of international programmes at PETA, explains. The rules surrounding animal testing vary from country to country. Chocolate, grapes, raisins, avocados and macadamia nuts are harmless in humans but toxic to dogs. The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. This section is divided into 5 groups. Many animals, especially the higher mammalian species, possess internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs. All over the world, communities impacted by HD are coming together to work towards new solutions and ways to cope. Usually, this middle view accepts experimentation on some, but not all, animals and aims to avoid unnecessary use of animals in scientific research by pursuing alternatives to animal testing. . Each of us can help prevent animal suffering and take a stand against vivisection by buying cruelty-free products, requesting alternatives to animal dissection at school, donating only to charities that dont experiment on animals, and demanding the immediate implementation of humane, effective non-animal tests by government agencies and corporations. Animals do not get many of the diseases we do, such as Parkinsons disease, major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimers disease, HIV or schizophrenia. By sharing these traits, they belong to a particular moral community and thus take on certain responsibilities toward each other and assume specific rights. Both because of the hereditary nature and long-term severity of the disease, the effects of Huntingtons disease cast a wide net. The Draize test has been criticized for being unreliable and a needless waste of animal life. The prevalence of HD in the West is estimated at five to ten people per 100,000 people. The UK government has admitted to testing on animals to develop protective pharmaceuticals, such as Nerve Agent Pretreatment Sets (NAPS), but this is just one example of how animals are used in the armed forces. Here you will find reviews on published resources related to Huntingtons disease. A hot topic in classrooms and on the minds of the public is the use of animals in experiments. Its now easy to see why animal testing is wrong: it violates basic principles of ethical research: it is maleficent, or harmful to the research subjects; it is not beneficial to them; it is forced on them since they dont consent; and it is unjust in that animals are burdened with problems not their own. Animals have been subject to inhumane testing processes for almost as long as humans have been manufacturing products. Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on animals. Many cosmetic companies, for example, have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects. First, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research. Web 145 debate topics and ideas simple debate topics death penalty and its abolishment. Of course, these laws are still far from ideal but they are much kinder than those of many other countries. It is not surprising to find that treatments showing promise in animals rarely work in humans. In respect to his capacity, many animals are no different than humans. WebBanning the use of such drugs, however, would greatly reduce the efficiency of the industry, driving up the cost of meat. Have students use the curated content in this debate resource kit to prepare an affirmative argument stating why animals shouldnt be used for experimentation. What do you think about animal testing? It helps This list is grouped by mechanism; each of the groups represents a different problem that HD causes in the brain, and the drugs that might fight that problem. The Moral Community., Frey, R.G. We hope this medium allows information to be more accessible and educational for audiences, and creates a space to discuss topics important to the HD community. A drug trial in France resulted in the death of one volunteer and left four others severely brain damaged in 2016. Its wrong and should be banned. Whats worse, scientific research isnt the only reason for animal testing. a testing ban prohibition to test finished cosmetic products and cosmetic ingredients on animals. Investigate what benefits laboratories, universities, and experimenters gain by using animals in experiments, and think critically about their motivations. However, in Asia, the prevalence of HD is approximately one tenth of the HD prevalence in Western population. Animal testing may be unsafe for humans. For those who want a ban on animal testing to be lifted, the procedure is not ethical but only serves to infringe on the rights of animals. The arguments made by critics however are shortsighted because history clearly indicates that the drugs that people are using nowadays came as a result of animal testing. The lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situation cause some animals to develop neurotic types of behavior, such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves. Human volunteers testing a new monoclonal antibody treatment (TGN1412) at Northwick Park Hospital, UK, in 2006 suffered a severe immune reaction and nearly died. UW-Madison Stops Cruel Experiments; Cats Saved, Alzheimers Researchers Admit That Experiments on Animals Are a Big Fat Failure. More recently, we. What is food addiction describe it in one paragraph. Its the whole nature vs. nurture. The cosmetics directive provides the regulatory framework for the phasing out of animal testing for cosmetics purposes. But the value we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived value to humans" (34). An analysis of over 100 mouse cell types found that only 50% of the DNA responsible for regulating genes in mice could be matched with human DNA. Another alternative to this test is a product called Eyetex. It is immoral for live humans to be used for possibly dangerous science experiments. 1047 Words5 Pages. The claim is that animals should be afforded the same level of respectful treatment as humans; in short, we should not have the right to kill animals, force them into our service, or otherwise treat them merely as means to further our own goals. Providing high quality, disease-free environments for the animals will help ensure that every animal counts. Use the following links to conduct research on general information about vivisection and prepare logical arguments: Use the following links to gather evidence and examples to support your position against experiments on animals: Research Articles, Scholarly Articles, and Investigative Analysis, Accounts and Statement From Vivisectors, Experts, and Patients, Eyewitness Investigations, Whistleblower Reports, and Videos, Evidence of the Wastefulness and Ineffectiveness of Vivisection. These individuals feel that animals have no rights because they lack the capacity to understand or to knowingly exercise these rights. (n.d.). For many people, the big question is: why do industries rely on animal experimentation? Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effectivenon-animal research methodsincluding organs-on-chips, organoids, human-based microdosing,in vitrotechnology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modelingthat are cheaper, faster, and more accurate than animal tests.